System types
Line-of-business applications, domain APIs, partner integration services, and internal platforms that multiple departments depend on.
technology
.NET delivery for business systems built to last
SKAD builds and extends .NET applications for organizations that need structured backends, strong tooling, and sustainable change—whether greenfield services or deliberate modernization of systems that already run the business.
Clear ownershipDecision rights mapped early
Reviewable deliveryVisible work and release cadence
Maintainable handoffDocumentation built into delivery
What this unlocks
A delivery path built around your constraints.
We deliver .NET APIs, line-of-business web systems, integration services, and internal platforms. Practices include modular design, testability, configuration discipline, async I/O where it helps, and enterprise integration with identity providers, messaging, and CRM/ERP-adjacent systems. UI pairings may be React SPAs or server-rendered approaches depending on UX and operational context. Cloud deployment spans AWS-hosted .NET workloads and hybrid realities common in established estates.
Capabilities
What the engagement can cover
Modern .NET practices
Modular solutions, dependency isolation, automated tests around domain rules, twelve-factor-minded configuration, and clear boundaries between web host and domain logic.
Enterprise integration
Authentication against existing identity systems, messaging patterns, and connections to CRM, ERP, and file- or batch-oriented partners common in operations-heavy orgs.
UI pairings
React front ends when product UX demands it; server-rendered .NET UI approaches when operational simplicity and tight server workflows win.
Modernization posture
Version upgrades, extract-and-replace of high-churn modules, and coexistence plans so users are not forced through a risky cutover for everything at once.
Engagement models
Staff augmentation inside enterprise product teams; dedicated squads for multi-quarter platforms; outsourced modules with explicit acceptance and documentation.
Business value
Make progress measurable and ownership explicit.
- .NET remains a pragmatic choice when durability, tooling, and long-lived domain models matter. Teams gain service boundaries they can evolve, upgrade paths that respect production risk, and integration surfaces finance and operations stakeholders can trust—without betting the roadmap on brittle desktop-era leftovers.
How we work01 02 03
From context to controlled delivery
Frame the work
Align goals, constraints, stakeholders, systems, and release pressure.
Shape the team
Choose the engagement boundary, roles, cadence, and technical approach.
Build transparently
Ship in reviewable increments with visible risks, decisions, and handoffs.
- Brownfield work starts with framework version reality, dependency graphs, and which modules carry regulatory or revenue risk. We prefer strangler and incremental upgrade patterns over big-bang rewrites. Legacy Framework code can be stabilized and carved carefully while modern .NET services take new traffic. Change management, environment parity, and rollback hooks are part of delivery planning—not optional polish.
Team shape
Specialists aligned to the work.
- .NET backend engineers comfortable with APIs and business workflows, modernization-minded developers who can sequence Framework-to-modern moves, integrators for identity and enterprise systems, and collaborators who expose clean APIs to React or other clients.
FAQ
Questions teams ask before starting
Do you work on legacy .NET Framework codebases as well as modern .NET?+
Yes. Many estates are mixed. We stabilize and extend Framework applications where needed while introducing modern .NET services for new capabilities, with an explicit coexistence plan.
Can you integrate .NET APIs with React?+
Yes. That is a common pairing. We focus on auth flows, contract clarity, and environment configuration so the SPA and API evolve without hidden coupling.
How do you approach upgrade risk?+
We inventory breaking dependencies, isolate high-risk modules, add characterization tests where missing, and stage upgrades behind environments and feature boundaries so production has a rollback story.